tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6235733697979948062.post2852482860737723692..comments2024-03-19T00:33:30.191-07:00Comments on our brain tumor cocktails and stories: ONC201 expanded access for H3 K27M mutant gliomasStephen Whttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00777652648990108253noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6235733697979948062.post-28314072820633408922019-04-07T11:05:22.690-07:002019-04-07T11:05:22.690-07:00First clinical experience with DRD2/3 antagonist O...First clinical experience with DRD2/3 antagonist ONC201 in H3 K27M-mutant pediatric diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma: a case report.<br /><br />https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30952114Stephen Whttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00777652648990108253noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6235733697979948062.post-42759378206211190582017-06-13T05:18:16.911-07:002017-06-13T05:18:16.911-07:00The phrasing is confusing. In the main body of the...The phrasing is confusing. In the main body of the text it says "The second lesion regressed to approximately 75% of the baseline size after 10.7 <br />months of therapy."<br />If it regressed to 75% of the baseline, that would be a 25% regression, but this is probably just bad phrasing, so it probably was a 75% regression as it seems to be saying in the abstract.Stephen Whttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00777652648990108253noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6235733697979948062.post-87427173699125935392017-06-13T05:03:06.004-07:002017-06-13T05:03:06.004-07:00Thanks for posting this!
The second tumour regres...Thanks for posting this! <br />The second tumour regressed by 76% according to the abstract:<br />"exhibiting regression by 85% in one lesion and 76% in the second lesion"Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com