Showing posts with label next_generation_sequencing. Show all posts
Showing posts with label next_generation_sequencing. Show all posts

Wednesday, 12 December 2018

Oncologica - genetic testing company in the UK

It was brought to my attention recently that there is a company in England providing genetic sequencing of about 505 cancer genes, and they can also provide quantification of Tumor Mutational Load and immunohistochemical testing of mismatch repair genes.  Their pricing is competitive with companies such as Caris, and I will likely be referring British patients to them from here on.

https://www.oncologica.com/


Friday, 1 June 2018

gene sequencing

Dear All,

I have likely a difficult and too general question. We have a possibility to perform gene sequencing on the  Illumina HiSeq 1500  platform.  Could you please advise and share information which mutations may/should be tested to provide options for the GBM treatment  besides the standard path (radioteraphy+TMZ and TMZ after that).

Many thanks.

Thursday, 22 March 2018

Should we get the NGS done? If yes, from where?

Hi folks/Stephen,
Needed a bit of help from you all. My mom is a GBM patient who was diagnosed in Sep 2017. Her cancer is IDH1/2 -ve, methylated and 1p/19q codeletion negative, this is the information that we gauged from the initial gene testing that was done by our hospital post surgery. We are now considering a next generation gene sequencing test done, and I had the following questions on the same:

1. How helpful has the gene sequencing report been for you so far, if you have got one done? What questions should I look at getting answered from this test?
2. Since there is very little tumor tissue that we all have, which is the best place to get the gene sequencing done from? I currently have read and spoken to OncoDNA, StrandAdvantage, RGCC Greece and FoundationOne so far. Which one would you recommend, and why? The recommendation could be different from the mentioned five too.

I read the following doc shared by Stephen in the Brain Tumor library too, but I'm not quite able to figure out on which test is a more appropriate one for what kind of patient. 
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1653spmu9DkVCKX16G0_ZUlsTuJOx_Ln2qVysJJI-uoU/edit#gid=0



There are so many genes written in all of them, that it's hard for me to be able to compare and make an informed call :/

Want to know if the gene testing will be of help in further treatment, and the drugs/supplements that we should use for her in the near future.

Her current status

1. Her MRI three months back showed no growth, but had choline elevation at two parts where there was tumor resection. We have her next MRI in about a week from now.

2. She will do her remaining chemotherapy cycles with Temozolomide+Lomustine, her cancer being methylated.

She currently is on ketogenic diet and lot of naturopathic supplements suggested by Nutrition Solutions. 

My plan going forward
After my mom is done with the chemotherapy, I plan to get her immunotherapy (Dendritic cell therapy) done.  Want to know if the gene sequencing will be an add on in this plan.

Wednesday, 24 January 2018

The importance of re-testing IDH status in IDH "wild-type" low grade gliomas

PATH-36. REPEATING TESTING IN IDH WILD TYPE LGG CASES. THE IMPORTANCE OF NEXT GENERATION SEQUENCING
Link to abstract

"the observation of a particularly favorable outcome in a group of 42 patients with IDH wild type LGG (OS=93.7 months) led us to assess IDH mutation with a more sensitive technique. Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) was used to evaluate IDH status in these tumor samples, and the results of NGS assay were compared with previous findings"

"Twenty-one (50%) of the 42 initial IDH wild type LGGs were found to present IDH mutation when tested with NGS. Four patients had R132H mutation and 17 cases showed other IDH mutations (4 patients with IDH2 mutation, 5 patients with IDH1 R132C mutation, 5 patients with IDH1 R132G mutation and 3 patients with IDH1 R132S mutation)."

"Repeating testing in IDH wild type LGG cases is crucial, as well as the technique used to assess this mutation. NGS is able to find IDH mutations in 50% of patients previously misdiagnosed"