Showing posts with label pembrolizumab_keytruda. Show all posts
Showing posts with label pembrolizumab_keytruda. Show all posts

Wednesday, 13 February 2019

Neo-adjuvant (before surgery) pembrolizumab

Neoadjuvant anti-PD-1 immunotherapy promotes a survival benefit with intratumoral and systemic immune responses in recurrent glioblastoma

http://sci-hub.tw/https://www.nature.com/articles/s41591-018-0337-7



This was a small, randomized trial for recurrent GBM at first or second relapse, who were candidates for surgical debulking and were on steroid doses less than 4 mg per day of dexamethasone or equivalent.  There were 16 patients in each arm. One arm (neoadjuvant) received pembrolizumab (Keytruda) 14 days before surgery, and further doses of pembrolizumab after recovery from surgery. The second arm (adjuvant) received pembrolizumab only after surgery.

The survival advantage of neoadjuvant pembrolizumab was statistically significant (hazard ratio = 0.39, P = 0.04).  Note that it's more difficult to achieve statistical significance in a smaller trial versus a larger one.  Patients in each arm were well-matched for typical prognostic features.

In light of the positive results of this trial, "we intend to expand the current study and pursue further clinical trials with neoadjuvant combination immunotherapeutics."

Thursday, 10 May 2018

Tumor Mutational Burden and response to immunotherapy

Tumor Mutational Burden as an Independent Predictor of Response to Immunotherapy in Diverse Cancers.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28835386


This study was a collaboration between UC San Diego, and Foundation Medicine.
Response rate, progression-free survival and overall survival following immunotherapies (in general, or specifically for immune checkpoint inhibitors such as anti-PD-1/PD-L1) was increased in patients with higher tumor mutational burden (as determined by genetic sequencing).


My commentary:
Newly diagnosed gliomas including GBM usually have low tumor mutational burden.  At highest risk for high tumor mutational burden (hypermutation) are likely those with MGMT-methylated tumors that recur following standard TMZ chemotherapy.

Pembrolizumab (Keytruda) is approved by the United States FDA, among other indications, "for the treatment of adult and pediatric patients with unresectable or metastatic, microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) or mismatch repair deficient solid tumors that have progressed following prior treatment and who have no satisfactory alternative treatment options. "

The very high mutational burden sometimes seen in recurrent gliomas following temozolomide chemotherapy is often caused by mutations in one or more of the mismatch repair genes (MHS2, MSH6, MLH1, PMS2).  Having genetic sequencing performed (in North America by Foundation Medicine or Caris, or different companies in other countries) for recurrent post-temozolomide grade IV tumors (especially MGMT methylated tumors) could be a worthwhile way to detect hypermutation/mismatch repair deficiency/microsatellite instability and get access to pembrolizumab outside of a trial.  I can't comment on how easy getting coverage would be (both for the genetic testing as well as the pembrolizumab), as it would in part depend on the policies of the various insurance providers.

Thursday, 8 March 2018

MDMX and PD-1 inhibitors

So the genetic testing came back on my partner’s tumor (GBM, first recurrence), and while researching the mutations, I found Stephen W’s account of the hyperprogression study linking use of checkpoint inhibitors with accelerated progression in people with certain mutations, including amplification in MDM2 or MDM4.  All 6 of the people in the cohort with MDM2/MDM4 amplifications experienced hyperprogression (across 5 different cancer types, none of which were primary CNS, although several had metastases in the brain; 5 were MDM2 amplified, 1 was MDM4).

My partner’s genetic report includes copy number gain in MDM4.  No indication of the size of the gain; I’ve asked the company if they can clarify.

As it happens, we started pembrolizumab 2 weeks ago.  I figured the worst that would happen was that it was ineffective; it never occurred to me that it might accelerate progression.

The study doesn’t prove that checkpoint inhibitors caused the hyperprogression.  It’s possible that MDM2/MDM4 amplification caused the hyperprogression on its own.   The possible mechanism seems understood: MDM2 suppresses p53, a major tumor suppressor (p53 is mutated in over 50% of all cancers).  I found one study that showed MDM2 amplification is prognostic for poor survival in breast cancer.  On other hand, the chart at the end of the hyperprogression study sure makes it look like acceleration began with the onset of checkpoint therapy.

My partner’s tumor showed high expression of PD-L1 (50%), and also has mutations in NF1 and TERT.  All three of those are correlated with better response to PD-1 inhibitors in other cancers.

The next pembro infusion is scheduled for March 19.  We have to decide by then whether to continue with it or not.  Thankfully we’ll have an MRI that morning.  The tough call will be if there’s no evidence of progression.  I know there’s no clearcut rationale for making a decision either way, but I’m curious if anyone here has any advice.

Other biologically relevant mutations found are TERT, PTPN11, NFE2L2, PTEN, and CDKN2A.  IDH1 is wildtype.  MGMT is reported as unmethylated by sequencing.  The tumor mutational burden increased from 2.05 to 5, and the MSI status is stable (i.e., no mismatch repair defect).  

Our current regimen: CCNU, pembrolizumab, Vitamin D, melatonin, PSK, curcumin (also levetiracetam, Vimpat, Xarelto)
Planned additions: boswellia
Actively considering: ECGC, THC/CBD, Hydro+ALA, celexocib, metformin, everolimus

Thanks,

Brandon

Wednesday, 14 February 2018

DNX-2401 oncolytic adenovirus phase 1 trial results

Phase I Study of DNX-2401 (Delta-24-RGD) Oncolytic Adenovirus: Replication and Immunotherapeutic Effects in Recurrent Malignant Glioma (click here for abstract)

I've uploaded the full PDF to the Brain Tumor Library -> 1. Therapies - human studies -> DNX-2401

In group A, 5 out of 25 patients (20%) lived for at least 3 years post-injection of DNX-2401, and three of these (12%) had dramatic responses (at least 95% reduction in cross-sectional area of enhancing tumor) and at least three years of progression-free survival.

This therapy is currently being tested in combination with pembrolizumab (anti-PD-1).


Tuesday, 30 January 2018

Blood-brain barrier and immune checkpoint inhibitors

Blood-brain barrier and immune checkpoint inhibitors

My partner has a recurrent and unoperable glioblastoma.
He is considering a therapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors (e.g. pembrolizumab or atezolizumab) as his tumor has extremely high mutation burden. Some doctors are in favour but some are not convinced and say that it won't work because of blood brain barrier (BBB).
Is there any research showing immune checkpoint inhibitors don't cross BBB?

Wednesday, 1 November 2017

DNX-201 With Pembrolizumab (Keytruda)

Hello All,

I am looking for any comments, experience and suggestions with the DNX-2401 trial.

The Phase II just opened and I am enrolled for the procedure on Monday.

My GBM was resected in June 2015 and there has been some mass increases in the area between my cavity and skull.  Shows some signs of tumor and some signs as necrosis.


Of the couple of trial options offered to me, (southern California) these seems like the best, like the biopsy aspect of this trial.

When I asked a GBM research scientist friend of mine, I got the following comment:

Paraphased:

 - DNX-2401 is a one shot try.  If it comes back up the biopsy hole, then nothing is going to happen.

So this makes sense, that if no DNX-201 then nothing for the PD1 to work on.

But is this really a concern?

Any, why cannot you just re-inject if this happens?

Marc



Thursday, 23 February 2017

chemo with dendritic vaccine

Dear all,
My son is finishing his second vaccine at IOZK. His tumor is astrocytoma III, H3K27m, low methylation ( our doctor still won't give us the percentage!), clean MRI ( only 4 months since surgery)
Van Gool is against any chemo for now. He wants to do another MRI in three weeks, and he added Accutane and Keytruda this time. Our US oncologist wants to do avastin and then temodar with CCNU. Another well-esteemed Russian NO who is very open- minded ( she was the one who recommended van gool to us) thinks we should continue with temodar while on vaccine since there is a good chance it worked till now. We are very confused - tend to just trust Van gool, but scared to give up chemo even for a month. Any thoughts? thank you!

Thursday, 19 January 2017

Agenus vaccine (HSPPC-96) plus pembrolizumab (Keytruda) for new GBM

We've just heard that UCLA will be starting a trial combining DCVax with nivolumab.
NCT03014804   (disregard the references to a "lung tumor" vaccine.  This is a GBM trial and those references were a mistake which should be fixed soon.


Another trial will soon be opening for newly diagnosed GBM testing the Agenus Prophage vaccine (HSPPC-96) in combination with pembrolizumab.  This is a randomized phase 2 trial and unfortunately one arm will be treated with standard of care + pembrolizumab + placebo, while the other arm gets standard + pembrolizumab + vaccine.

Another trial of HSPPC-96 for newly diagnosed GBM reported some results at ASCO 2015.  Patients with high PD-L1 expression had median survival of 18 months, while patients with low PD-L1 expression had an amazing median survival of 44.7 months.  There is thus very good rationale to combine this vaccine with a PD-1 inhibitor such as pembrolizumab.

Saturday, 16 July 2016

DC vaccine plus PD-1 antibody in GL261 mouse model

A nod to the anonymous commenter who posted a link to this study in the Dendritic Cell Therapy?thread.  This study is the subject matter for my latest update on Astrocytoma Options.

http://astrocytomaoptions.com/immunotherapy/

PD-1 ANTIBODIES (NIVOLUMAB AND PEMBROLIZUMAB)
Late in 2014, the FDA approved two novel drugs for metastatic melanoma. These two drugs, pembrolizumab (Keytruda) and nivolumab (Opdivo) are both antibodies against PD-1, an immune checkpoint found on the surface of immune cells, that leads to anergy (deactivation) or death of immune effector cells when in contact with PD-L1 (ligand for PD-1) expressed on other cells. Though the PD-1/PD-L1 immune checkpoint system evolved as an important means to prevent autoimmunity conditions, the system is clearly co-opted by tumors to escape targeting by host immune cells. As of this writing in July 2016, there are no less than 13 trials currently recruiting glioblastoma patients for therapy involving nivolumab or pembrolizumab, and one trial testing a novel PD-L1 antibody (MEDI4736). The first trial for high grade gliomas to combine a dendritic cell vaccine with a PD-1 antibody is the AVERT trial at Duke University, which opened in early 2016 (NCT02529072). A second trial called CAPTIVE, opened in June 2016, combines the DNX-2401 adenovirus with pembrolizumab (NCT02798406). These two trials are likely the leading edge of the future of immunotherapy: combination of vaccine or oncolytic virotherapy with immune checkpoint blockade.
Preclinical evidence supporting this combination in high grade glioma comes in the form of a study published online in July 2016, by a team of UCLA researchers [1]. In this study, mice were treated with subcutaneous injections of a lysate-pulsed dendritic cell vaccine prepared from murine progenitor bone marrow cells and GL261 mouse glioma cell lysate. Mice were treated with vaccines at either the first day of intracranial GL261 glioma implantation, or at day 3 after tumors were established. Dendritic cell (DC) vaccination significantly increased survival times only in the group receiving early vaccination. In contrast, no prolongation of survival was seen in mice receiving later vaccination, in spite of tumor infiltration by glioma-reactive CD3+ lymphocytes in these mice.
PD-1 was increased on tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in both untreated and DC vaccinated mice compared to splenic lymphocytes, indicating a localized immunosuppression in the tumor environment. Following DC vaccination, PD-1 was the only marker of immune inhibition increased in the tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte population. All other markers examined, including CTLA-4 (target of the drug ipilimumab) and TGF-beta, were downregulated following vaccination.
These observations led the researchers to treat mice with established gliomas with the combination of DC vaccination plus PD-1 monoclonal antibody (similar in function to the FDA-approved antibodies nivolumab and pembrolizumab). Remarkably, while no survival benefit was observed in mice treated with either vaccine or PD-1 antibody alone, 40% of mice treated with the combination survived at least to day 60 (none of the mice in the other arms survived to day 40).
The survival benefit of the combined therapy was found to be completely dependent on CD8+ cytotoxic T-lymphocytes, as depletion of these cells in the mice wiped out any benefit of treatment. Though mice in both DC vaccine treated, and DC vaccine plus PD-1 antibody treated groups had increased infiltration of CD8+ lymphocytes into their tumors, only combination treated mice had increased proportions of activated CD8+ CD25+ T-cells, showing that PD-1 antibody in addition to DC vaccine was necessary to maintain an activated population of CD8+ T-cells in the tumor environment.
Combination treatment also increased populations of tumor-infiltrating memory T-cells, and when surviving mice from the combination treatment group were re-challenged with a second injection of GL261 glioma cells in the contralateral brain hemisphere at day 60, they again survived significantly longer than untreated controls, though they had no additional treatments beyond the initial treatment at the time of the first tumor cell injections.
GBM samples taken from clinical trial patients before and after treatment with DC vaccines at UCLA showed both abundant expression of PD-L1 (the ligand for PD-1) in the tumor environment, as well as increased PD-1 expression on CD8+ tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes following dendritic cell vaccination. This demonstrates that, as seen in mice, PD-1 expression is a mechanism of immunosuppression following DC vaccination in human patients, a means of tumor resistance to the treatment.
Ex vivo, tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes taken from GBM patients undergoing resection showed greatly increased cytotoxicity against tumor cells when PD-1 antibody was added to the co-culture.
Significance: this study clearly shows that tumor lysate-pulsed dendritic cell vaccination is not sufficient to increase survival in mice with established gliomas, and that additional reversal of local immunosuppression with PD-1 antibody is also required. Human GBM tissue showed the same increase in PD-1 expression following dendritic cell vaccination, as a means of tumor resistance to treatment. Pending demonstration of the safety of combining dendritic cell vaccinations with PD-1 antibodies in current trials for high grade glioma, future vaccine trials should logically include such antibodies (eg. nivolumab or pembrolizumab), especially for patients with significant residual tumor post-resection. This combination treatment is likely necessary to bring the benefits of anti-tumor vaccines to a patient population that otherwise might not significantly benefit – those with significant residual tumor burden.
  1. PD-1 blockade enhances the vaccination-induced immune response in glioma. Antonios et al. 2016.
    READ SOURCE DOCUMENT



Monday, 5 October 2015

DNX-2401 virotherapy plus PD1 antibody trial

Many of you probably already saw this on Al's news blast, but I wanted to post it here too:  a new phase 2 trial will be testing DNAtrix's DNX-2401 virotherapy with Merck's PD-1 antibody pembrolizumab (Keytruda).

http://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20151001005478/en/Merck-DNAtrix-Announce-Phase-2-Immuno-Oncology-Collaboration#.VhMY6vlVikp

This will be the second trial to combine a PD-1 antibody with a second immunotherapy (the other is Duke's trial combining their CMV-targeted dendritic cell vaccine with nivolumab, plus pre-conditioning of the vaccination site with tetanus/diptheria toxoid.

https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02529072

These are just the sorts of combinations we need!

Sunday, 23 August 2015

Chloroquine and immune status

Hi All, Alan isn't having chemo but is on f/n Avastin, Chloroquine, Tagamet, Metformin, DCA and Celebrex plus usual supplements and struggles to keep white cell count within normal parameters, usually it's just below baseline. I thought not having chemo for 6 months or so other than a small stint of 20mg TMZ daily for a few weeks which was 4 months ago would see his immune system back to robust self.  We are doing a dc vax privately and have been trying to hedge our bets by not putting all our eggs in one basket, but don't want to do anything that will impede his immune system. Just a reminder Alan is IDH1 negative and unmethylated so trying to cover all bases.
Chloroquine can be an immune suppressant and taken with Tagamet would increase Chloroquine levels in blood.
 I have been thinking of cutting Chloroquine by half but am really at a crossroads as I feel the chloroquine/avastin combo is what is keeping the tumour stable. Alan has been on Avastin for almost 12 months (2 weeks short of).
Does anyone else have trouble with their white cell count? I would like to know how other chloroquine users immune systems are holding up and would appreciate all thoughts and suggestions.
Thanks,
Linda